Game Developers Association Of The Philippines Gdap scorecard

Company Overview

Game Developers Association Of The Philippines Gdap is a BPO company.

Oops! It looks like you've reached a page that doesn't exist. If you believe there's a problem with the website, please contact us. We apologize for any inconvenience. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok

Executive summary

Brand Profile: Voice: industry-focused. Voice: community-oriented. Voice: promotional. Imagery Style: Public-facing brand signals emphasize a trade-association identity for the Philippine game development sector, but the available public sources do not provide sufficient detail on logo usage, palette, or typography.. Client Value Proposition: Summary: GDAP’s public-facing value is industry advocacy, convening, and promotion for the Philippine game development ecosystem. It does not publicly present itself as a vendor delivering outsourced business services.. Value Points: Title: Representation. Value Points: Description: Provides a public industry voice for Philippine game developers and related organizations.. Value Points: Title: Collaboration. Value Points: Description: Connects with government, education, and industry partners to support sector growth.. Value Points: Title: Promotion. Value Points: Description: Helps raise visibility of Philippine game development locally and internationally.. Company Overview: Highlights: Trade association for the Philippine game development industry. Highlights: Established in 2007. Highlights: Publishes board information and news on its official website. Description: Game Developers Association of the Philippines (GDAP) is a trade association in the Philippines established in 2007 to represent and promote the country’s game development industry.. Competitive Differentiators: Differentiators: Title: Industry-specific mandate. Differentiators: Description: GDAP is focused specifically on the Philippine game development sector rather than providing broad commercial BPO services.. Differentiators: Title: Ecosystem convening role. Differentiators: Description: Public reporting indicates GDAP works with government, associations, and academic institutions to strengthen the sector.. Differentiators: Title: National promotion platform. Differentiators: Description: GDAP positions itself as a representative body for the local industry and a promoter of Philippine game development globally.. Key Firmographics: Founded Year: 2007. Sectors Display: Game development. Sectors

Strengths

• Brand Profile: Voice: industry-focused. Voice: community-oriented. Voice: promotional. Imagery Style: Public-facing brand signals emphasize a trade-association identity for the Philippine game development sector, but the available public sources do not provide sufficient detail on logo usage, palette, or typography.. (public_web; observed 2026-08-23)
• Client Value Proposition: Summary: GDAP’s public-facing value is industry advocacy, convening, and promotion for the Philippine game development ecosystem. It does not publicly present itself as a vendor delivering outsourced business services.. Value Points: Title: Representation. Value Points: Description: Provides a public industry voice for Philippine game developers and related organizations.. Value Points: Title: Collaboration. Value Points: Description: Connects with government, education, and industry partners to support sector growth.. Value Points: Title: Promotion. Value Points: Description: Helps raise. (public_web; observed 2026-08-26)
• Company Overview: Highlights: Trade association for the Philippine game development industry. Highlights: Established in 2007. Highlights: Publishes board information and news on its official website. Description: Game Developers Association of the Philippines (GDAP) is a trade association in the Philippines established in 2007 to represent and promote the country’s game development industry.. (public_web; observed 2026-08-26)

Gaps

• The reviewed public sources do not establish buyer-specific service levels, staffing commitments, or acceptance criteria for a defined scope. (public_web; observed 2026-08-26)
• The reviewed public sources do not establish a buyer-specific continuity design, recovery objective, security schedule, or named delivery team. (public_web; observed 2025-10-13)
• The reviewed public sources do not provide directly comparable commercial terms and independently verified outcomes for a like-for-like engagement. (public_web; observed 2026-08-04)

Firmographics

GB100 score

Overall score: 47

• egs: 36
• growth: 50
• reputation: 45.5
• ai_readiness: 50
• market_footprint: 50
• digital_readiness: 52.6

Scores are calculated from published evidence and the current GB100 methodology; payment does not affect rank.

Services and operating scope

Competitive Landscape: Competitors: Name: International Game Developers Association. Competitors: Evidence: GDAP states it has strong ties to the international community of game developers via the International Game Developers Association.. Competitors: Relationship: adjacent. Competitors: Name: Philippine game studio associations and industry groups. Competitors: Evidence: GDAP describes itself as representing and promoting the country's game development industry and its members.. Competitors: Relationship: adjacent. Positioning: GDAP is positioned as the Philippine trade association for game development studios and related service providers rather than as a commercial BPO vendor.. Market Signals: GDAP describes itself as established in 2007 and composed of digital game development, service, and technology studios.. Market Signals: GDAP membership page lists capabilities such as co-development, porting, live operations, player support, QA and testing, localization, art, Unity, and Unreal.. Differentiators: Trade-association model serving studios, service providers, and academia. Differentiators: Industry advocacy, events, and member community positioning. Recent News: Articles: Date: 2026-05-22. Articles: Title: GDAP Strengthens Ties with DFA OUECD to Promote Philippine Game Development Industry Globally. Articles: Source: GDAP. Articles: Summary: GDAP published a 2026 update about strengthening ties with DFA OUECD to promote the Philippine game development industry globally.. Articles: Date: 2025-04-10. Articles: Title: GDAP and CITEM team up to boost PH GameDev Industry. Articles: Source: GDAP. Articles: Summary: GDAP reported collaboration with CITEM to support the Philippine game development industry.. Articles: Date: 2026-03-15. Articles: Title: Game developers get further backing from DTI. Articles: Source: Tribune. Articles: Summary: A March 2026 report said the DTI collaborated with GDAP to strengthen initiatives advancing the country’s game development sector.. Employee & Client Sentiment: Sentiment Trend: unknown. Employee Satisfaction: unknown. Services & Offerings: Categories: Name: Industry representation. Categories: Services: Advocacy for the Philippine game

Geography

Delivery Center Details: Centers: City: Taguig. Centers: Country: Philippines. Financial Health: Overall Health: unknown. Leadership & Executives: Executives: Name: James Ronald Lo. Executives: Title: President. Executives: Name: Solon Chen. Executives: Title: Vice-President. Executives: Name: Ria Lu. Executives: Title: Executive Director. Executives: Name: Alvin Juban. Executives: Title: Chairman. Pricing & Engagement: Summary: No public pricing, membership fee schedule, or commercial engagement model was verified from the accessible public sources reviewed.. Reputation & Reviews: Summary: No public review-platform ratings or third-party reputation scores were verified in the available sources.. Executive Summary: Summary: GDAP is an industry trade association rather than a BPO provider. Public information shows it serves as a representative body for Philippine game development and related ecosystem stakeholders, with board leadership and sector promotion activities.. Asset Logo: Visibility: public. Description Long: Oops! It looks like you've reached a page that doesn't exist. If you believe there's a problem with the website, please contact us. We apologize for any inconvenience. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok.

Methodology

Game Developers Association Of The Philippines Gdap's BPOIndex scorecard is assembled from public, attributable evidence rather than vendor-submitted marketing claims or a paid-placement package. The research pass reviewed 25 distinct source URLs and retained 28 substantive facts or company sections with direct citations. Each retained observation is tied to the page where it was found and to the date on which that page was observed. Information that could not be traced to a reviewed public source was left out. This distinction matters because a provider's website may describe broad capabilities without publishing buyer-specific service levels, staffing commitments, commercial terms, delivery capacity, or independently comparable outcomes. Collection and publication are separate. Collection discovers public pages, records evidence, and builds structured sections for company background, services, delivery footprint, operating signals, and credentials. Publication includes only substantive observations carrying an HTTP citation. The strengths below identify areas where the provider has published inspectable information; they are not guarantees of quality, price, security, or fit. Evidence gaps are questions the reviewed sources did not answer at a buyer-specific level, not negative claims about the provider. Peer links are navigation aids from other canonical BPOIndex profiles, not a claim that every company is identical in size, geography, specialization, or commercial model. Buyers should compare the underlying service taxonomy, locations, evidence, and current score dimensions. Confirm scope-specific service levels, named delivery sites, staffing assumptions, security controls, continuity plans, pricing units, minimum commitments, and referenceable outcomes directly with the provider. The observed dates show when evidence was collected. Later enrichment can add newly published sources, but unsupported inference, duplicate shells, and generic filler do not qualify a page for indexing.

Read the full GB100 methodology

Coverage gaps

• Insufficient public evidence for employee coverage.
• Insufficient public evidence for headquarters coverage.
• Insufficient public evidence for service taxonomy coverage.
• Insufficient public evidence for industry taxonomy coverage.

Contact

Website: http://www.gdap.org.ph/

Email: contact@gdap.org.ph

Phone: 6328172727

Comparable BPO providers

• 1 Call Direct
• 100 Ninjas
• 123employee
• 13primes