New England Medical Billing scorecard

Company Overview

New England Medical Billing is a BPO company.

Executive summary

Brand Profile: Voice: professional. Voice: service-oriented. Voice: reimbursement-focused. Client Value Proposition: Summary: The public value proposition centers on improving reimbursement, handling billing and collections, and providing reporting support for healthcare providers that want a specialized regional billing partner.. Value Points: Title: Reimbursement focus. Value Points: Description: The company explicitly states it works to maximize reimbursement for clients.. Value Points: Title: Billing and collections coverage. Value Points: Description: Public service copy says staff performs billing and collection functions for client organizations.. Value Points: Title: Analytical visibility. Value Points: Description: The practice management platform is said to include reporting and analysis tools.. Company Overview: Highlights: Founded in 1990. Highlights: Rhode Island-based. Highlights: Serves healthcare providers across New England. Highlights: Supports medical practices and municipalities. Highlights: Describes itself as a multi-specialty revenue cycle management company. Description: New England Medical Billing, Inc. is a Rhode Island-based medical billing and revenue cycle management provider founded in 1990 and serving healthcare providers across New England. The company states that it supports medical practices and municipalities and positions itself as a multi-specialty revenue cycle management company focused on maximizing reimbursement.. Competitive Differentiators: Differentiators: Title: Regional longevity. Differentiators: Description: Public materials indicate the firm has operated since 1990, suggesting long regional tenure in New England.. Differentiators: Title: Multi-specialty focus. Differentiators: Description: The company describes itself as a multi-specialty revenue cycle management company.. Differentiators: Title: Emphasis on reimbursement maximization. Differentiators: Description: Public copy states a goal of collecting every available dollar for clients.. Differentiators: Title: Reporting tools. Differentiators: Description: The company says its practice management platform provides reporting and

Strengths

• Brand Profile: Voice: professional. Voice: service-oriented. Voice: reimbursement-focused. (public_web; observed 2025-10-22)
• Client Portfolio: Industry Concentration: healthcare providers across many specialties. Industry Concentration: medical practices. Industry Concentration: municipalities. (public_web; observed 2025-10-22)
• Client Value Proposition: Summary: The public value proposition centers on improving reimbursement, handling billing and collections, and providing reporting support for healthcare providers that want a specialized regional billing partner.. Value Points: Title: Reimbursement focus. Value Points: Description: The company explicitly states it works to maximize reimbursement for clients.. Value Points: Title: Billing and collections coverage. Value Points: Description: Public service copy says staff performs billing and collection functions for client organizations.. Value Points: Title: Analytical visibility. Value. (public_web; observed 2025-10-22)

Gaps

• The reviewed public sources do not establish buyer-specific service levels, staffing commitments, or acceptance criteria for a defined scope. (public_web; observed 2025-10-22)
• The reviewed public sources do not establish a buyer-specific continuity design, recovery objective, security schedule, or named delivery team. (public_web; observed 2024-09-19)
• The reviewed public sources do not provide directly comparable commercial terms and independently verified outcomes for a like-for-like engagement. (public_web; observed 2024-09-24)

Firmographics

GB100 score

Overall score: 47

• egs: 36
• growth: 50
• reputation: 45.5
• ai_readiness: 50
• market_footprint: 50
• digital_readiness: 52.6

Scores are calculated from published evidence and the current GB100 methodology; payment does not affect rank.

Services and operating scope

Client Portfolio: Industry Concentration: healthcare providers across many specialties. Industry Concentration: medical practices. Industry Concentration: municipalities. Competitive Landscape: Competitors: Name: Unknown. Competitors: Relationship: adjacent. Positioning: Regional medical billing and revenue cycle management provider serving New England healthcare organizations and municipalities.. Market Signals: public site references billing, coding, receivables, reporting, and practice management tools. Market Signals: service pages indicate coverage across many specialties and healthcare providers. Differentiators: long operating history since 1990 or 1993 as stated across public pages. Differentiators: multi-specialty revenue cycle management focus. Differentiators: public emphasis on maximizing reimbursement and detailed collections. Reputation & Reviews: Summary: A public employee-review page shows a small sample of reviews with an overall rating of 3.8 out of 5 from 10 reviews, but this is not a client-review source and should be treated as limited evidence of workplace sentiment only.. Credentials: Detail: Based on 10 employee reviews in Providence, RI.. Credentials: Rating: 3.8/5. Credentials: Platform: Indeed. Employee & Client Sentiment: Red Flags: reviews mention clique behavior. Red Flags: reviews mention limited advancement. Red Flags: reviews mention layoffs without notice. Green Flags: some reviews describe the workplace as laid back or good working environment. Green Flags: one review describes management as great and the workplace as fun. Sentiment Trend: unknown. Sentiment Themes: Theme: workload and pace. Sentiment Themes: Sentiment: mixed. Sentiment Themes: Key Phrases: fast paced. Sentiment Themes: Key Phrases: more work. Sentiment Themes: Key Phrases: last minute. Sentiment Themes: Theme: management and trust. Sentiment Themes: Sentiment: mixed. Sentiment Themes: Key Phrases: management should be more honest. Sentiment Themes: Key Phrases: did not trust the managers. Sentiment Themes: Theme: teamwork and growth. Sentiment Themes: Sentiment: mixed. Sentiment Themes: Key Phrases: not team players. Sentiment

Geography

Delivery Center Details: Centers: City: Rumford. Centers: Model: remote or office-based model not publicly verified. Centers: Country: United States. Centers: City: South Easton. Centers: Model: office-based model not publicly verified. Centers: Country: United States. Key Firmographics: Founded Year: 1990. Sectors Display: Healthcare. Sectors Display: Medical billing. Sectors Display: Revenue cycle management. Sectors Display: Municipal billing. Headquarters Display: Rumford, Rhode Island. Executive Summary: Summary: New England Medical Billing appears to be a long-established regional medical billing and revenue cycle management firm with public-facing emphasis on reimbursement optimization, billing and collections, reporting, and specialty billing support.. Financial Health: Overall Health: unknown. Leadership & Executives: Executives: Name: Nancy Dolgin. Executives: Title: Principal/President. Pricing & Engagement: Summary: No public pricing, fee schedule, contract model, or engagement-term details were verified from the available sources.. Services & Offerings: Categories: Name: Medical billing and collections. Categories: Services: Billing functions. Categories: Services: Collection functions. Categories: Services: Claims submission. Categories: Name: Revenue cycle management. Categories: Services: Revenue cycle management services. Categories: Services: Reimbursement optimization. Categories: Name: Practice management and reporting. Categories: Services: Practice management platform. Categories: Services: Reporting and analysis tools. Categories: Name: Specialty billing. Categories: Services: Ambulance billing. Tech Stack & Tools: Proprietary Tech: practice management platform with reporting and analysis tools.

Methodology

New England Medical Billing's BPOIndex scorecard is assembled from public, attributable evidence rather than vendor-submitted marketing claims or a paid-placement package. The research pass reviewed 10 distinct source URLs and retained 16 substantive facts or company sections with direct citations. Each retained observation is tied to the page where it was found and to the date on which that page was observed. Information that could not be traced to a reviewed public source was left out. This distinction matters because a provider's website may describe broad capabilities without publishing buyer-specific service levels, staffing commitments, commercial terms, delivery capacity, or independently comparable outcomes. Collection and publication are separate. Collection discovers public pages, records evidence, and builds structured sections for company background, services, delivery footprint, operating signals, and credentials. Publication includes only substantive observations carrying an HTTP citation. The strengths below identify areas where the provider has published inspectable information; they are not guarantees of quality, price, security, or fit. Evidence gaps are questions the reviewed sources did not answer at a buyer-specific level, not negative claims about the provider. Peer links are navigation aids from other canonical BPOIndex profiles, not a claim that every company is identical in size, geography, specialization, or commercial model. Buyers should compare the underlying service taxonomy, locations, evidence, and current score dimensions. Confirm scope-specific service levels, named delivery sites, staffing assumptions, security controls, continuity plans, pricing units, minimum commitments, and referenceable outcomes directly with the provider. The observed dates show when evidence was collected. Later enrichment can add newly published sources, but unsupported inference, duplicate shells, and generic filler do not qualify a page for indexing.

Read the full GB100 methodology

Coverage gaps

• Insufficient public evidence for employee coverage.
• Insufficient public evidence for headquarters coverage.
• Insufficient public evidence for service taxonomy coverage.
• Insufficient public evidence for industry taxonomy coverage.

Contact

Website: https://www.nembgroup.com/

Comparable BPO providers

• 1 Call Direct
• 100 Ninjas
• 123employee
• 13primes